If Humans Are Descended From Apes, Why Are There Still Apes?
Humans are not descended from modern apes. Instead on the tree of life both humans and
modern apes share a common ancestor from whom the two species then split off. We are most genetically similar to chimpanzees,
so our common ancestor likely was shared with them, and finding the “Chimp
Human Last Common Ancestor” has been one of the goals of evolutionary
scientists. Current thinking is that the
split occurred around 6 million years ago, though there are arguments for both
a longer and a shorter time. The CHLCA is
likely to be Sahelanthropus
tchadensis (or a very similar species—there are various candidates), and here
is a reconstructed picture of that handsome critter:
Moving on from Sahelanthropus
tchadensi our ancestors evolved into Australopithecus afarensis,
around 4 million years ago, and that creature is shown here:
Evolution of our species continued and eventually we split
off from Homo sapiens neanderthalensis around 500,000 years ago:
Neanderthal |
to become modern
humans under the designation of Homo
sapiens:
As I’ve said before in this blog, the slightest objective investigation of evolution shows that it's not only true, but not even subject to scientific question. In my prior posts (see below) I’ve explained why it’s clear that evolution is the only explanation of life that’s consistent with the incontrovertible facts.
The Tree of Life [Click To Enlarge] |
J.B.S. Haldane |
Famed biologist J.B.S.
Haldane was once asked what would convince him that evolution was not true and
he replied that the discovery of a fossiled rabbit in Precambrian rocks would
do it. Rabbits had not evolved prior to the
Cambrian period of rock formation, so their presence in older rocks would throw
all of evolution out of sync. Of course
rabbits appearing at the proper moment are only one example of what the
rock/fossil record must show. What is
telling is that the scientific evidence is perfect:
all fossils are found in the rocks in the exact order that evolution predicts. Isn’t that evidence of the highest kind that
evolution is rock solid (pun intended) right?
Not believing in evolution in the 21st century is an embarrassing confession of ignorance. It’s the same as not understanding that the earth is billions of years old or agreeing with conspiracy theorists who think that the moon landing was a hoax. Basic understanding of how the world works requires that some knowledge of evolution be part of your resume.
------------------------------------------------
Related
Posts:
“I Don’t Do Science,” July 2, 2010
“Rock Around the Sun,” December 31, 2010
“Is Evolution True?” July 13, 2011; http://douglaswhaley.blogspot.com/2011/07/is-evolution-true.html
“Is Evolution True?” July 13, 2011; http://douglaswhaley.blogspot.com/2011/07/is-evolution-true.html
“Intelligent Design, Unintelligent Designer?”, May 12,
2012
“A Guide to the Best of My Blog,” April 29, 2013; http://douglaswhaley.blogspot.com/2013/04/a-guide-to-best-of-my-blog.html
"I'm an atheist, but that word only means I don't believe in God." I don't wish to quibble, but I always thought an atheist was a person who believed that the existence of God could not be proved. (BTW, I too am an atheist.)
ReplyDeleteQuibble accepted.
ReplyDelete