Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade!
.
All that’s needed is for Mitt Romney to win the coming
presidential election.
In deciding who to vote for it’s common for voters to forget
that the president has enormous influence over the future direction of the
country merely by the exclusive power to nominate federal judges. These judges, once appointed, serve for life
and thus on carry the president’s policies long after the president leaves office
and is busy building his library.
The current United States Supreme Court is divided into four
liberals, four conservatives, and then there’s Justice Anthony Kennedy right in
the middle, which (as I’ve often noted on this blog) makes him the most
powerful judge in the entire world. On
his vote almost all controversial issues which divide the country teeter.
Justice Ginsburg |
But Justice Kennedy would lose this awesome power if one of
the other Justices retired and he/she was not replaced by someone of the same
liberal/conservative base. Four of the
Justices are in their 70s: one conservative (Scalia), two liberals (Ginsburg
and Breyer), and Kennedy himself. All
are in pretty good health except Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is highly likely to
resign from the Court in the coming year.
That would give the next president the power to appoint a new
Justice. If Obama is reelected he’d
appoint someone similar to Justice Ginsburg and nothing would change, but if
Romney becomes president he will of course appoint a conservative, and the
liberals would be reduced to a three person minority.
In that case Roe v.
Wade would be in significant danger of being overturned. Yes, it’s an existing precedent, but in the past
when the Court has dramatically changed its mind (from allowing “separate but
equal” status for blacks in 1896 to declaring segregation unconstitutional in
1954, or in 2003 when in an opinion by Justice Kennedy the Court overruled a 1986
case that had allowed homosexual sex to be punished as a felony) the Court has
simply declared that its earlier misjudgment was “wrong when decided.” Roe
was based on a understanding of fetal development that subsequent scientific
conslusions show to be suspect. An artificial
three month rule is hard to defend. “Life
begins at conception,” pro-lifers contend (which is wrong—life clearly begins
even earlier since both sperm and egg are alive before they meet). If Roe
is to be defended it must be on the basis of a woman’s right to control her own
decisions about when to have children, and that argument hasn’t been given much
weight by typical conservatives (and certainly not those who support Mitt
Romney). In its last decision on point (in
2003) the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s Partial-Birth Abortion Ban statute,
with Kennedy himself writing the majority opinion. Delighted, many states passed “trigger laws”
that would automatically reinstate criminal penalties for abortions if the
Court were to suddenly overrule Roe v.
Wade in its entirety.
If you’re reading this and you think abortion should be
illegal and therefore applaud overturning Roe v.
Wade, does your comfort zone also include some other things likely to
happen if the conservatives obtain complete control of the Court? Look at this partial list of possibilities:
1. Big Business and
Big Banks will prevail in all disputes coming up for the next decade, so, by
golly, it’ll be a great time to be rich!
2. Few government
regulations will likely survive challenge (environmental protection, tobacco
use, acid rain, consumer protection, safety rules, health care, etc.).
3. No constitutional
protection for gays, who will remain second class citizens (no marriage, no
adoptions, no property rights, no job protection, no visitation rights, etc.). However, even if the new Court mysteriously
decided that the U. S. Constitution requires that gays be treated like
everyone else and allowed to marry, Mitt Romney has already signed the National
Organization for Marriage’s pledge to support a constitutional amendment taking
this civil right away from homos, even though it would be the first time
discrimination had ever been added to
the Constitution.
4. Christians will be
able to do as they like (meaning at least that God will return to the classroom
as intelligent design finally achieves equal standing with that scientific heresy
called evolution), but other religions (particularly Muslims) or the non-religious
will be constitutionally suspect.
A vote for Willard Mitt Romney is necessarily a vote for his upcoming
federal judges.
-----------------------------------
Related Posts:
"Is Evolution True?" July 13, 2011
"Jumping the Broom: How 'Married' are Married Gay Couples?" July 17, 2011
“President Mitt Romney?” April 21, 2012
"Jumping the Broom: How 'Married' are Married Gay Couples?" July 17, 2011
“President Mitt Romney?” April 21, 2012
“Intelligent Design, Unintelligent Designer?,” May 12,
2012
"Ohio To Put Guns in Baby Strollers," June 17, 2012
"Ohio To Put Guns in Baby Strollers," June 17, 2012
“Obamacare, John Roberts and the Supreme Court,” July 3,
2012
“Mitt Romney, Leveraged Buyouts, and Morality,” September 12, 2012
“Mitt Romney: A Mormon President?” October 17, 2012
“A Guide to the Best of My Blog,” April 29, 2013
“Mitt Romney, Leveraged Buyouts, and Morality,” September 12, 2012
“Mitt Romney: A Mormon President?” October 17, 2012
“A Guide to the Best of My Blog,” April 29, 2013
Comments
Post a Comment